CUNY Brooklyn Unveiled Scandalous Cheating in Final Exams

The New York Post shared that professors at CUNY Brooklyn exposed a “scandalous” level of cheating in final exams, and it’s quite disheartening. Plagiarism is noted to have occurred among over a third of students in some courses, as revealed by the university’s board. This recent issue has been tagged CUNY Brooklyn scandal and poses reputational problems for the students and the university at large.

Understandably, no educational institution desires to be related to academic misconduct issues; it could hurt the school’s reputation and make it difficult for its students to secure responsible employment opportunities post-graduation. Though universities could institute stiffer measures to stop academic misconduct challenges like what CUNY Brooklyn is experiencing, there are concerns, too.

For one, when colleges decide to go above and beyond to curb cheating, everyone becomes a possible suspect. As such, strict measures taken could land innocent students into problems they had no connection with in the first place. Therefore, if you find yourself caught up in an academic misconduct problem that you didn’t cause or connect with, learning about CUNY’s academic misconduct policies would be beneficial.

Defining Academic Misconduct

In general terms, academic misconduct implies anything that gives someone an unfair edge in their studies or coursework. For specificity reasons though, CUNY Brooklyn singled out plagiarism and cheating as two prominent types of academic misconducts:

Cheating: Where unauthorized resources are leveraged by an individual for academic work; such resources can vary from using crib sheets sneakily introduced during exams to get answers online even during closed-book tests. The policy offers many examples of what constitutes cheating; some include copying from another student during a test, changing grades on graded tests before submitting them for marking results better than earned honestly;

Plagiarism: This centers around presenting someone else’s research, writing, or ideas as your own. The policy offered examples to specifications- they include copying without citations or quotation marks, presenting someone else’s research/mindset without credit facilities.

Other academic misconduct types exist such as falsification of official documents/records and generally obtaining an unfair academic advantage. Note that even helping someone cheat constitutes a punishable offense.

Justice Procedures

An appointed Academic Integrity Officer is in charge of disciplinary rulings associated with academics. There’s also the Academic Integrity Committee at every university college under the university. These committees handle cases review.

The policy divides violations into two types- academic and disciplinary. Both come with their own judicial processes coupled alongside specific sanctions.

Low-level offenses get handled only by assigning an academic sanction to the student by the instructor; notations of these cases are placed in academically suspended students’ files for officer reference. Teachers must submit all documentation needed when given an assignment that’ll result in a course grade deduction for being sanctioned due to cheating/plagiarizing instances.

Disciplinary offenses are those considered severe or repeating actions despite facing previous academic sanctions. Disciplinary sanctions may include suspension or expulsion based on case specifics.

Grievance Process

Depending on whether a student is protesting an academic/disciplinary issue, appeal procedures differ significantly. Students charged with academic violations but disagreeing with professor punishment can air their position by submitting it in writing as part of their respective colleges’ grade appeal process.

Besides this option, students who refuse responsibility against charges levied against them may appeal such decisions to CUNY Brooklyn’s Academic Integrity Committee. Each college operates its own procedures but provides opportunities for both sides( students & instructors) to present witness testimony and evidence concerning issues raised by striking parties.

Suppose the misconduct effectively ends up classified as a disciplinary infraction; In that case, appeals could be processed via CUNY Brooklyn’s Faculty-Student Disciplinary Committee, which conducts formal hearings while dealing explicitly with such appeals.

Attorney Todd Spodek, Academic Misconduct Lawyer

Academic misconduct accusations are something that students frequently take lightly when they happen. Many times, students come across allegations, accept responsibility, and associated sanctions without any form of contestation a lot, which aggravates the problem.

Having an experienced attorney by your side sometimes makes all the difference, Attorney Todd Spodek has inarguable expertise in handling academic and school’s misconduct cases to help protect his many clients from unfounded charges levied against them.

Additionally, Spodek possesses valuable experience negotiating fair sentencing for indicted clients; he is comfortable within courtrooms and holds specializations in school misconduct issues. He knows how to work with university officials’ judicial policies alongside representing accused students during disciplinary committee sessions/one-to-one conversations.

Avoid getting caught up in a situation like CUNY Brooklyn’s academic misconduct scandal- fight back concisely – you deserve justice! If you or someone close to you is facing some kind of academic misconduct accusation levelled against them by their respective college/university/school authorities, don’t hesitate to contact Attorney Todd Spodek from Spodek Law firm today via 888-555-3686 or our automated online form.